SurdaticsSURDATICS

For universities & researchers

Fieldwork your grant can afford, and your reviewers can check.

Primary data collection is where most research budgets go and where most replication fails. The instrument, the sample, the payments and the archive are usually four separate problems, each solved badly under time pressure.

Why this is hard right now

Grant budgets do not stretch to an agency

Commissioning professional fieldwork often costs more than the rest of the project combined, which quietly shapes what questions get asked at all.

Replication needs an archive nobody built

Reviewers increasingly ask for the underlying data. A spreadsheet on a laptop is not a defensible archive, and it cannot prove it is the version the analysis used.

Reaching the right people takes months

Recruiting a specific population — by profession, region or language — is slow, and paying them across borders is slower.

What Surdatics gives you

Draft the instrument in minutes

Describe the research goal and Surda AI drafts questions checked for leading and confusing wording. You edit it; nothing is fielded without your review.

Target by demographics and profession

Filter by age, gender, location, education and profession, and see how many verified respondents match before you commit any budget.

Offline and multilingual

Field with ODK Collect or KoboCollect where there is no signal, in 27 languages including 17 African ones, and get one dataset back regardless of channel.

A citable, sealed dataset

Each dataset carries a SHA-256 fingerprint and a timestamp anchored to a public ledger — a reviewer can confirm the data behind your analysis is unchanged, without an account.

Publish it and earn back

List a dataset on the marketplace and other teams can license it. Respondents share in every resale, which is also why they answer carefully.

Start free

The free plan collects responses, drafts surveys with AI and seals datasets. No sales conversation to begin.

Where the platform stands today

Read live from the platform, not written into this page.

Worth being precise about: a seal establishes that a dataset is unaltered since collection and that respondents were paid. It is not a peer review and makes no claim about sampling validity — that stays your methodological responsibility, which is exactly as it should be.

Check any dataset's fingerprint yourself →

Tell us what you need to measure

Who you need to hear from, roughly how many responses, and where. You will hear back from someone who can actually answer it.

Start a study free